"Don't Tell Me (What Love Can Do)" Van Halen (1995)
Wrestling with Agency, Sin, and Surrender
Some songs demand more from us than we expect. They sneak up with a lyric that sticks, a riff that lingers, and a voice that isnāt merely singing. Itās pleading, pushing back, searching. Van Halenās āDonāt Tell Me (What Love Can Do)ā is that kind of song.
At first listen, it sounds like a furious rejection, of religion, of sentimentality, of moralizing. And in part, it is. The speaker throws down the gauntlet from the first line:
āItās okay, Iāll do what I want
If I choose, I can take the fall.ā
This is autonomy on full display. The kind of freedom that feels bold, defiant, maybe even admirable, until you follow it down the path it leads. The next verse isnāt metaphorical:
āI can drive
I can shoot a gun in the streets
Score me some heroin.ā
This is what self-rule without restraint looks like. Itās freedom devolving into chaos. Itās the broken logic of sin: I get to choose, even if what I choose destroys me.
And then, mid-song, the tone begins to shift, not softening, but opening. The narrator considers an alternative:
āIs it right to take the easy way
Close your eyes, get on your knees and prayā¦ā
Now weāre in religious territory. But not with wide-eyed faith. This is suspicion, scorn, a gut-level resistance to surrender. And yet, this resistance isnāt empty. Itās the resistance of someone whoās seriously considering what it would mean to stop trying to save himself. Heās not ready to kneel, but he knows thereās nothing left on the road heās been walking.
At the heart of the song is a repeated line that can be read either as a dismissal or a cry for help:
āDonāt tell me what love can do.ā
But context matters. Sammy Hagar, who wrote the lyrics, originally wanted to sing āI want to show you what love can do.ā Thatās not a small shift. It moves the whole song from rejection to hope, from doubt to testimony. It implies that the pain, the defiance, the anger, all of it, is part of a journey. Not a finished product, but a soul in process.
That alternate chorus never made it into the final version. And maybe thatās the point.
Because hereās what the song does do: it refuses easy answers. It calls out shallow religion and naĆÆve optimism. It admits that agency alone wonāt save you but neither will giving it up to a system that asks for your submission without offering healing.
But somewhere between verse and chorus, between defiance and despair, the real message begins to emerge.
This isnāt just a rejection of religion. Itās a lament over what sin has done: to the soul, to society, to those weāve lost. Itās a howl from someone whoās tried to fix it himself. Whoās tried to make peace with the damage. And whoās starting to see that surrender, real surrender, to real love might be the only way out.
But not love as sentiment. Love as sacrifice. Love that bears a cross, not just a feeling.
In a culture where ādo what you wantā is still the anthem of choice, this song offers something better: an honest picture of where that road leads and a painful, hopeful whisper that another way might exist.
Even if he canāt quite say it yet.
Comments
Post a Comment