Friday, February 5, 2010

Sherlock Holmes (2009)

The people who think that Sherlock Holmes didn’t stick to the literary source well enough have probably never read the books. Either that or they lack the ability to not color their experience with the cinematic interpretations of Holmes. Thus far, all of these interpretations have failed to break free from the basic tropes that have replaced the literary Holmes. That is until now.

As for the people who complain that the mystery and the plot are not worthy of the source material, they are right. But, come on! Sometimes you are in the mood for an entertaining yarn with adventure and laughs and couldn’t be bothered with solving a mystery. Maybe the fact that adventures with a Victorian supernatural bent are a guilty pleasure of mine makes me dismiss the fact that there was no real mystery here.

At its core, everything Ritchie and company have done is simply to re-imagine Homes beginning with the stories and not the films. Just about every aspect of the characters and situations we see here have their origin in Doyle. Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law make an excellent Holmes and Watson for today. Here is one reviewer that hopes we get more of this franchise.

The one caveat is the story, though. The old story where magic is explained away by the clever use of logic is one thing. To simply replace Victorian superstition and magic with equally ignorant modern day “science” and “chemistry” is downright lazy. How hard is it to have Holmes say, “All of the apparent supernatural activity was really all natural-science-activity.” In the end a made-up chemical reaction is not any better than a magic potion, is it?

3 comments:

  1. Yes! Wasn't it FUN?! And great dark Victorian London ambiance!
    We,too, thought Downey and Law are a great duo...finally, an intelligent Watson!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolutely, Watson is almost the best part of the film (or at least his interaction with Holmes).

    The plot is pretty poor though, but the expositon at the end (direct from the stories) made up for it somewhat I thought.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for your comment, Detective. I enjoyed your review a lot. Check it out, people:

    http://drunkdetective.blogspot.com/2010/02/sherlock-holmes-guy-ritchie-movie.html

    ReplyDelete

NonModernBlog written content is the copyrighted property of Jason Dietz. Header photos and photos in posts where indicated are the copyrighted property of Jason and Cheryl Dietz.
Promotional photos such as screenshots or posters and links to the trailers of reviewed content are the property of the companies that produced the original content and no copyright infringement is intended.
It is believed that the use of a limited number of such material for critical commentary and discussion qualifies as fair use under copyright law.

Popular Posts This Month

Popular Posts This Week

  © Blogger template Brownium by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP