An exercise in reflection, a reaction to ideas, a perspective from a Christian witness, cultural catalyst, an instigator in Europe. As an exercise, NonModern will adhere to several stylistic rules(and break them when necessary.) Find me on facebook or twitter.
When Jim Henson and Frank Oz teamed up to make a fantasy masterpiece with puppetry, they achieved some amazing results. The set design, the characters, and the world building are all absolutely amazing. Watching “The Dark Crystal” today, thirty years later, one wishes that filmmakers would use more practical effects from time to time.
It is always a joy to see people use creativity and “outside the box” thinking the way the Muppet team always do. Here in “The Dark Crystal” they are outside their own box even. The world that they have created seems plausible and alien, not just fuzzy and cute. The designs of the Skeksis and Mystics in particular are examples of technical and artistic genius. Henson set out to take puppetry to a new level, where characters seemed real and not merely symbols. In that objective, they succeeded.
Where the film falls apart, however, is in the plot. Whereas the team excels artistically, they flop in the storytelling. What we get is the most generic and underdeveloped “hero’s journey” along with a dualism so basic that it exposes the inherent weaknesses of that worldview. No matter how you try to explain the problems away, it is simply illogical and unsatisfying. If Henson was trying to create alternate storytelling realities, he used them in this case to tell an unrealistic, story lacking in truth. A reality of balanced and equal good and evil feels false. Evil is not an equal of good, but rather its absence.
NonModernBlog written content is the copyrighted property of Jason Dietz. Header photos and photos in posts where indicated are the copyrighted property of Jason and Cheryl Dietz. Promotional photos such as screenshots or posters and links to the trailers of reviewed content are the property of the companies that produced the original content and no copyright infringement is intended. It is believed that the use of a limited number of such material for critical commentary and discussion qualifies as fair use under copyright law.